News

Four Reasons For Naming Names – Aiding The Arbiter In Multi-Party Arbitration (This edition concludes our five part series looking at multi-party fact pattern scenarios in intercompany arbitration. Please refer to back issues # 113-116 for additional information). >> “She named names” … many will remember this infamous line from Elaine Benes in the Seinfeld … Continued

All Parties Present Or – Is It On A Need To Know Basis? (This issue of the Arbitration Blog continues our series looking at strategy in a multi-party scenario. Please refer to back issues # 113-115 for further information). Claims with multiple parties present unique dynamics both for the presenters of the case and the … Continued

Relying On Arbitrator Intuition – But Without The Evidence (This issue of the Arbitration Blog continues our look at a real-world scenario in i/c/a presented over our last two editions). For the sake of our strategic discussion; let’s assume that Party B did formally implead Party C into the arbitration case (most likely) in an … Continued

What The Arbitrator Doesn’t Know – Might Actually Help You (This issue of the Arbitration Blog continues our look at a real-world scenario in i/c/a presented over our last two editions). We know that tied to this three-party case the carrier for vehicle B had filed an arbitration against the carrier for vehicle C in … Continued

Odd Man Out – Exploring Strategy In Multi-Party Arbitration This issue of the Blog plays off a scenario first presented in last week’s edition; please review that fact pattern. Knowing that B filed an Answer to A’s arbitration docket and recognizing that B, in their Contentions, argued the negligence of another vehicle C but did … Continued