News

WE’RE NOT ‘DEFAULTING’ ANYONE: FUNDAMENTALS OF INTERCOMPANY ARBITRATIONWE’RE NOT ‘DEFAULTING’ ANYONE FUNDAMENTALS OF INTERCOMPANY ARBITRATION    It’s an all-time favorite !  It’s the case where the adverse carrier has responded to an Arbitration filing we have made for our client and their sum total liability argument is to remind the Arbitrator of Rule 4-1.  Wait … Continued

POSTING UP ON POST-HEARING RELIEF: FUNDAMENTALS OF INTERCOMPANY ARBITRATIONPOSTING UP ON POST-HEARING RELIEF FUNDAMENTALS OF INTERCOMPANY ARBITRATION    Having the opportunity to avail yourself of Rule 3-9 and post-decision relief as we described last week does require very specific documentation in having the Award reviewed.  As noted; there is a tie-in between Rule 3-9 and … Continued

THE THREE SIXTY ON 3-9: FUNDAMENTALS OF INTERCOMPANY ARBITRATIONTHE THREE SIXTY ON 3-9 FUNDAMENTALS OF INTERCOMPANY ARBITRATION    We mentioned last week the solution that was crafted in concert with the subrogation industry allowing for post-hearing relief on Arbitration decisions involving coverage.  Critically important to remind advocates of the timeframes built into Rule 3-9.  First … Continued

COVERING THE SECOND GO ROUND: FUNDAMENTALS OF INTERCOMPANY ARBITRATIONCOVERING THE SECOND GO ROUND FUNDAMENTALS OF INTERCOMPANY ARBITRATION    As has been said often … the Arbitration process belongs to the parties.  When an Arbitration administering organization gets it totally right with creation of a Rule … it’s nice to see the complementary nature of an … Continued

WE’VE GOT THE BASES ‘COVERED’: FUNDAMENTALS OF INTERCOMPANY ARBITRATIONWE’VE GOT THE BASES ‘COVERED’ FUNDAMENTALS OF INTERCOMPANY ARBITRATION    Last issue we discussed a Rule that while important may not be all that familiar to advocates on a day-to-day basis.  We go from A-ball to the Major Leagues in this edition with discourse on a Rule … Continued